[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-ia64-devel] Irq injection vs event channel: My memo
Hi, because I think it is decision time, here is a my memo: We have three choices: * Bull vIOSAPIC patch cleaned-up [without IRQ sharing] submitted this week and Intel vIRQ patch submitted when ready. I think this is the compromise, and this allows my to work on SMP/SMP-g and driver domains during Intel work. * Bull vIOSAPIC patch is withdrawn and Intel works on vIRQ. I think this is the Intel solution. This will avoid left and right turns, but will also suspend work on SMP-g (because of IPI). * Bull vIOSAPIC patch cleaned-up and submitted. Intel vIRQ patch delayed. This is the Bull solution. It will allow progress on SMP/SMP-g and dd, and will save force to continue working on new features to try to include Xen/ia64 in the new RH release. Now, Intel please choose among these choices (or another choice), and I will accept it. Tristan. _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |