[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Fixed VTI domain destruction


  • To: "Masaki Kanno" <kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:31:15 +0800
  • Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:32:28 +0000
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcZOS4Kp6egZziKiRxSjq73AzjvwJQABCV1QADlzt0A=
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Fixed VTI domain destruction

Hi Masaki,
        Two domain destroy issue has been fixed. The patch will be sent out 
next week. Your destroy patch is very helpful to community developers :)
Thanks & Best regards 
-Xiantao

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of You,
> Yongkang
> Sent: 2006年3月23日 16:04
> To: Masaki Kanno
> Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Fixed VTI domain destruction
> 
> Masaki,
> 
> Your patch is really important and great helpful! Needn't sorry. ;)
> I am playing some auto testing to try to give more accurate result in time.
> 
> I also found another similar bug before that patch. If I create 1 xenU and 1
> VTI, destroying xenU will cause the whole system hang.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Masaki Kanno [mailto:kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >Sent: 2006年3月23日 15:29
> >To: You, Yongkang
> >Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Fixed VTI domain destruction
> >
> >Hi Yongkang,
> >
> >I'm sorry. I was hasty. I carried out a test to repeat that
> >created/destroyed only one VTI domain. I don't know the
> >cause why a system was hung up.
> >
> >Best regards,
> > Kan
> >
> >You, Yongkang wrote:
> >>Hi Masaki,
> >>
> >>It is a great patch! I have tried the latest Cset about the destroying VTI
> >Domain. But a bug induced in. :)
> >>
> >>If 1 VTI domain, it is okay. But if 2 VTI domain is created, destroy 1 VTI
> will
> >hang whole system.
> >>
> >>Best Regards,
> >>Yongkang (Kangkang) 喟慎
> >>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> >Masaki
> >>>Kanno
> >>>Sent: 2006定3??22?? 20:24
> >>>To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Fixed VTI domain destruction
> >>>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>This patch fixed the VTI domain destruction processing.
> >>>I tested creation/destruction domU. The "domU" which I tested is
> >>>VTI domain and non VTI domain. There was not the memory leak
> >>>issue, and VTI domain is not left in a zombie state.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Masaki Kanno <kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>>Best regards,
> >>> Kan
> >>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.