RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] flush.S not para-virtualized

["Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>]

Agreed, this needs to be paravirtualized.

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Tian, Kevin
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:33 AM
> To: Tristan Gingold; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] flush.S not para-virtualized
> 
> >From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx]
> >Sent: 2006å3æ27æ 20:32
> >
> >Le Lundi 27 Mars 2006 14:22, Tian, Kevin a Ãcrit :
> >> From: Tristan Gingold
> >>
> >> >Sent: 2006å3æ27æ 20:22
> >> >
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >unless I am wrong, arch/ia64/lib/flush.S is not para-virtualized.
> >> >However, it
> >> >has an 'fc' instruction.  Is it expected ?
> >> >
> >> >Tristan.
> >>
> >> If based on previous discussion, seems same case to be fixed...
> >I am lost: what is the previous discussion ?
> >
> >Tristan.
> 
> Sorry for ambiguous here. I just mean your previous discussion about 
> how to handle 'fc'. Since 'fc' has different behavior in ring 
> 0, seems we still 
> need to virtualize this case in flush.S.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kevin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel