[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] SMP-guest status
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 18:26 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote: > Le Jeudi 20 Avril 2006 17:11, Alex Williamson a écrit : > > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:22 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote: > > > The change in time.c is just to work around a kernel bug. Linux kernel > > > requires at least an interpolator. [Hence I think there is no platform > > > without ITC drift]. > > > > I'm not sure I'd call it a bug. > Here are the facts: if you boot linux 2.6.16 with ITC_DRIFT bit set, kernel > crashes. That's a bug to me. I agree that the kernel shouldn't crash *if* you have an alternate time source such as an HPET. Do you? The ITC time interpolator is only designed for ITCs that are nearly synchronized and do not drift (ie. they're driven from the same clock source). The ITC_DRIFT flag is an indication that the ITC are not driven by the same clock source and therefore may drift. If we were to use the ITC interpolator on a system that reports ITC_DRIFT we would get sporadic jumps in time depending on which CPU's ITC we're using as a reference. > > The kernel requires some kind of > > timesource for an interpolator. AFAIK, SGI systems are the only ones > > that report ITC drift and they have a platform timesource to compensate. > ^^^ no ITC drift > Thank you for the info. No, to be clear, SGI systems are the only systems that I know of that set ITC_DRIFT in the sal_platform_features. Presumably their hardware does drive the ITC of the various nodes in the system from different clock sources. They therefore cannot make use of the ITC interpolator. To compensate for this, they have a platform specific time interpolator registered for SN systems. All ia64 platforms must provide either non-drifting ITCs (as indicated by not setting the ITC_DRIFT flag) or provide an alternate time source to be registered as a new time interpolator. I suppose one could argue that a single ITC could be used as a timesource in the drifting case, but the overhead in doing this would be impractical and the current ITC interpolator is not designed to do so. Thanks, Alex -- Alex Williamson HP Linux & Open Source Lab _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |