[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Remove unused contig mem flag for VTi


  • To: "Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:05:05 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 02:06:16 -0700
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcaxWd08VEa2k2k7RLWx081SLbEvKwAAFn1Q
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Remove unused contig mem flag for VTi

Hi, Tristan
        Yes, but current VMX_DOMAIN check based on vcpu, so I think we had 
better set a flag in arch_vcpu for convenience or change VMX_DOMAIN 
implementation. Am I right? 
Thanks & Best Regards
-Xiantao

OTC,Intel Corporation

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 2006年7月27日 16:54
> To: Zhang, Xiantao; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Remove unused contig mem flag for VTi
> 
> Le Jeudi 27 Juillet 2006 10:15, Zhang, Xiantao a écrit :
> > This patch intends to remove the confusing flag ARCH_VMX_CONTIG_MEM for
> > VTi. It was used for indicating that VTi needs contiguous memory.
> > Currently, it seems useless. In addition, add the flag ARCH_VMX_DOMAIN
> > to ensure VMX_DOMAIN check correctly with all vcpus.
> The ARCH_VMX_DOMAIN flag is the same as arch.is_vti.
> I suppose we don't want this double use.  One of them must be removed.
> 
> Tristan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.