[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]RID virtualization discussion


  • To: "Isaku Yamahata" <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:25:47 +0800
  • Cc: Xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 24 May 2007 01:23:58 -0700
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Acedz6tzOrvA12BqR9GJdQFzOBkS1QADI3ug
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel]RID virtualization discussion

> Isaku Yamahata 
>Sent: 2007年5月24日 14:49
>
>Could you explain your test in detail?
>I suppose KB = Kernel Bnech = measuring kernel complile time, right?
>How domains are created? There are four cases with/without patches.
>
>Did you run kernel compile simultaniously in 4 domains or only 1 domain?
>i.e. created 5 domains and run kernel compile in each 4 domains
>     dom0 + domU(2vcpu) + domU(4vcpu) + domVTi(2vcpu) + domVTi(4vcpu)
>     at the same time
>
>Or create dom0 + single domain and run kernel compile in 1 domain.
>   repeated each cases.
>     dom0 + domU(2vcpu),
>     dom0 + domU(4vcpu),
>     dom0 + domVTi(2vcpu),
>     dom0 + domVTi(4vcpu)
>

We have tested following cases
There are 6 physical processors.
And local_purge_all is executed about 2000 per second on each processor.

Dom0(1vcpu) + domU(2vcpu)
Dom0(1vcpu) + domU(4vcpu)
Dom0(1vcpu) + vti(2vcpu)
Dom0(1vcpu) + vti(4vcpu)
Dom0(1vcpu) + vti(2vcpu) + vti(2vcpu)


Thanks,
Anthony

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.