[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Question to frametable_miss()


  • To: Kouya Shimura <kouya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:06:55 +0200
  • Cc: xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:07:24 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: s=s768; d=fujitsu-siemens.com; c=nofws; q=dns; b=0T7UHM2xkUdBrtUv4apXRo1xfKqJPFywuQwmpO4d5ngwNnDB3E1BTO1Q77K4RSq9nHbwtvAu3Hu9N75OgsBrVez4bVVNNkZgG0HM3YexZddbz3pc8Rg66Tj4GFEChIqh;
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Hi Kouya,

Am Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2007 schrieb Kouya Shimura:
> Hi Dietmar,
>
> I wrote this code.
> There is no speical reason except for my debugging.
> Currently the value should be 0.
> If Xen uses protection keys, the value must follow it too.
>
> Thanks,
> Kouya
>
> Dietmar Hahn writes:
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  > currently I'am looking at the code to bring in protection key support in
>  > xen and found the following lines in arch/ia64/xen/ivt.S within the 
>  > function GLOBAL_ENTRY(frametable_miss)
>  > ....
>  > mov r25=0x700|(PAGE_SHIFT<<2) // key=7
>  > ...
>  > mov cr.itir=r25
>  >
>  > What is the sense of the 0x700 ? Currently Xen doesn't use protection
>  > keys. So why is this explicitly set here?
>  > Many thanks for any hints!
>  >
>  > Dietmar.

I already thought in this direction.
Many thanks.

Dietmar.


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.