[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Strange code in vmx_init.c
Post URL: http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/ia64/xen-unstable.hg?rev/3c8039aa5004 Good good study,day day up ! ^_^ -Wing(zhang xin) OTC,Intel Corporation >-----Original Message----- >From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >Behalf Of Zhang, Xing Z >Sent: 2007年9月10日 9:33 >To: Tristan Gingold; Xen-ia64-devel >Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Strange code in vmx_init.c > >I think Isaku have the answer. Is it related to MCA? > >Good good study,day day up ! ^_^ >-Wing(zhang xin) > >OTC,Intel Corporation >>-----Original Message----- >>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >>Behalf Of Tristan Gingold >>Sent: 2007年9月8日 0:26 >>To: Xen-ia64-devel >>Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] Strange code in vmx_init.c >> >>Hi, >> >>in vms_final_setup_guest() I can read: >> >> v->arch.privregs = (mapped_regs_t *)vpd; >> vcpu_share_privregs_with_guest(v); >> >>Why is vcpu_share_privregs_with_guest() called ? Do we >really >>want make the >>vpd writable by the guest software ? Looks like a bug to me. >> >>Tristan. >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list >>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel > >_______________________________________________ >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list >Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |