RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Shall we put open source firmware source in XEN/IA64 tree

["Zhang, Xing Z" <xing.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>]

This is a patch per your comments. I am 
not sure I am right(Actually I didn't careful read
code in xencommon before). Pls correct me if I wrong.
Below are the changes I did:

+
+#define XENCOMM_INLINE_FLAG 0x8000000000000000UL
+
+static inline int
+xencomm_arch_hypercall_xen_version(int cmd, void *arg)
+{
+    return _hypercall2(int, xen_version, cmd, (unsigned long)arg | 
XENCOMM_INLINE_FLAG);
+}
+

I think told HV the arg is physical address is enough.

Good good study,day day up ! ^_^
-Wing(zhang xin)

OTC,Intel Corporation

>-----Original Message-----
>From: tgingold@xxxxxxx [mailto:tgingold@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2007?9?13? 20:59
>To: Zhang, Xing Z
>Cc: Alex Williamson; xen-ia64-devel
>Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Shall we put open source firmware
>source in XEN/IA64 tree
>
>Quoting "Zhang, Xing Z" <xing.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> Hi Alex:
>>      The open source firmware works fine now. Shall we put it
>in
>> XEN/IA64 tree? So when people do clone, they also get firmware
>source. Then
>> we can add a script in Makefile to build binary
>> for people when they building source of XEN/IA64. This can
>make
>> XEN/IA64 pure open source and convenient to user.
>>
>> Any advice?
>I fear the sources are too big (almost the same size as Xen).
>But we may put the binary in the tree.
>
>BTW, did you get my comment to your last patch ?
>
>Tristan.

Attachment: hypercall_for_smbios2.patch
Description: hypercall_for_smbios2.patch

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel