[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH][VTD]change ioports_permit_access interface
Isaku Yamahata wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:49:57PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote: >> Isaku Yamahata wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 05:36:58PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote: >>> >>> It's correct that xen VMM doesn't fully understand io area. >>> However the VMM know all about RAM. >> >> Thanks for your explanation, see my comment. >> >>> >>> So far !mfn_valid() has sufficed for the current implementation >>> in order to detect IO area. >>> However you are going to into the case which needs more precise >>> detection. But what we want is the way to detect whether >>> the page is NOT conventional memory. Not io area. >>> There are three (or four) cases >>> >>> - !mfn_valid() case >>> This means that there isn't a corresponding struct page_info. >>> So we just skip reference counting over this type. >> >> Mfn_valid maybe not precise. >> One page can accommodate several page_info. >> page_infos in the same page have different status, some page_infos >> refer to normal memory. >> Other page_infos are supposed not to exist, due to they are in the >> same page, probe in function ia64_frametable_probe succeeds. Is it >> possible? > > Yes, in theory. The above is exactly what I have in mind. > > >>> - mfn_valid() case >>> - no ram >>> I suppose this is the case you want to address. >>> In this case, the corresponding struct page_info can be >>> owned by DOMID_IO. This case needs to be addressed. >> >> Does mfn_vaild return true for MMIO now? > > In theory, yes in general as you described above. > In practice, it depends on efi memory map, how init_frametable() > is implemented and PAGE_SIZE. > > To be honest I'm not sure whether such a case exists or not in > practice. (note:with CONFIG_VIRTUAL_FRAME_TABLE=n and enough memory, > such a case exists.) > But by the fact that you tried to add the new bit, PAGE_DIRECT_IO, > I had thought that you had encountered such a case. Just checked the code, If CONFIG_VIRTUAL_FRAME_TABLE=y, init_virtual_frametable will only setup page_info for EFI_MEMORY_WB attribute. That means mfn_valid returns fause for MMIO and PORT IO if efi_memory_descriptor is correct. As you said, mfn_valid should work, PAGE_DIRECT_IO is not necessary. Thanks, Anthony > > Probably it is a safer way to implement a more precise function > for this purpose. > > thanks, > >> If it return faule for MMIO, >> We can use mfn_valid for VTD, means DOMID_IO is not used so far. >> >> Thanks, >> Anthony >> >> >> >>> >>> - RAM >>> - conventional memory (EFI_MEMORY_CONVENTIONAL) >>> This case was already handled by the current implementation. >>> >>> - other type RAM >>> I'm not sure whether this case matters. >>> If it matters, we can handle this case as same as no ram case. >>> >>> >>> thanks, >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list >> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |