Re: [Xen-merge] io_apic.c, part 1

[Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>]

> OK, this is roughly what happens if you do this, without pissing around
> with all the makefiles and include headers for func declarations etc.
> Yes, there's a lot less ifdefs. Not sure I like it any better personally,
> and it's going to be a pig to maintain out of tree. Opinions?

It looks better, but some logical ordering of the functions which
remain and which are moved would be nice.

I would suggest to do it and then merge early in 2.6.14. I can follow
on x86-64 then.

-Andi

_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge