[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-merge] status


  • To: "xen-merge" <xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:35:33 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:33:35 +0000
  • List-id: xen-merge <xen-merge.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcWd0ej+2FtoGFeLScmOi6R9cmzAJQ==
  • Thread-topic: status

Guys,

Where do you think we stand as regards xen / vmi ?

Andrew responded to my message saying he thought I'd put forward good
points why the ROM approach is not the way to go, but I'm not sure what
the current 'community opinion' is?

Any ideas how best to proceed? Keep pushing the sub-arch approach, and
maybe have vmware add vmi hooks to that?

Thanks,
Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.