[Xen-merge] Re: synch_bitops.h

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 06.01.06 15:05:12
>>>
>On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:28:33PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> I realize that it was your preference to not split the i386 and
x86-64
>> variants, as I had suggested with my patch. However, in course of
>> undoing that patch the bug fixes got dropped, too. Was that
>> intentional?
>
>I dropped the changes where instead of using =m, you suggested using
+m.
>The original Linux' bitops.h uses =m and using +m doesn't really make
>a difference in this case.

As far as I know, there actually is a patch in Andi's queue to change
that. I just thought it would be best to incorporate this correction now
instead of waiting for (and then perhaps forgetting about) the mainline
change.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge