|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-merge] Re: synch_bitops.h
>So AFAIK synch_bitops.h is equivilent to bitops.h with #defined >CONFIG_SMP > >Can't we use this somehow to reduce the amount of repeated code? Sure, this would be possible. But would anyone like the to be added conditionals (bitops.h has many more operations defined than synch_bitops.h, and these would need to be disabled)? And similarly for the need to alter the function names? At least from my experience, adding a new file will have less resistance than cluttering an existing one... Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-merge mailing list Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |