Re: [XenPPC] [linux-ppc-2.6] [XEN] The VIO rewrite

[Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 5, 2006, at 11:18 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:02:41PM +0000, Xen patchbot-linux- 
> ppc-2.6 wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > # Node ID 2a9c6a23cd1292e9ed361e33d640ce84a6fbdb53
> > # Parent  f4d382795e57b926cd82256bcb3a74c539731796
> > [XEN] The VIO rewrite
[snip]
> I gave the newtwork tests a spin with this patch.  After 4 hours I
> stopped the tests.
>
> I see a bunch of these warnings on the xen console.
> ---
> (XEN) allocated RMA for Dom[13]: 0x18000000[0x4000000]
> (XEN) Domain[13].0: initializing
> (XEN) WARN at /home/tony/Xen/xenppc-unstable.hg.working/xen/include/ 
> asm/mm.h:262
> (XEN) [000000000000F8A0] 000000000040D8B4 .gmfn_to_mfn+0x70/0xa4
Ok, This happens because a foreign map might have been unmapped to  
early, I saw this early on, but thought I nailed it. guess not.
> On the bright side, asside from the fact the tests are taking a  
> long time, at
> least some of them are succeeding.
>
> ---
> Blade4:~/xm-test # egrep '(PASS|FAIL|SKIP)' network_vio.output
> XFAIL: 02_network_local_ping_pos.test
> PASS: 03_network_local_tcp_pos.test
> PASS: 04_network_local_udp_pos.test
> XPASS: 05_network_dom0_ping_pos.test
> PASS: 06_network_dom0_tcp_pos.test
> PASS: 07_network_dom0_udp_pos.test
> XFAIL: 11_network_domU_ping_pos.test
> FAIL: 12_network_domU_tcp_pos.test
> FAIL: 13_network_domU_udp_pos.test
> ---
Is there a difference between "PASS" and "XPASS"?

I tried runnig quick and it took a long time, the system was  
unresponsive.
much like:
  http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=727

I really need to get to the bottom tod that one.
-JX

_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel