Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH] [RESEND] Xencomm patch

[Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 2, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Jerone Young wrote:

> Sorry guys. Please ignore this patch. I found a bug with it. Will  
> submit
> a fixed version shortly.
Ok, took a peek though and it seems that not all xencomm_map*() calls  
have there return values checked.
Using ENOSPC for the errno for xencomm_map_no_alloc() seems  
inappropriate, since it ENOSPC is really about devices.  ENOMEM is  
not right because we are not trying to allocate. I do not think  
anything fits perfectly, but I'd go with EINVAL because argsize is  
simply to big and an invalid argument.
Thoughts?

-JX


_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel