[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-tools] Re: Question about xenbus
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 17:31 +0100, harry wrote: > I'm getting stuck on the scenarios involving tools removing a device > whilst FE and/or BE domains are running with drivers installed. > > If I understand correctly, the tools delete the FE and BE > directories in the store which leaves the FE and BE drivers without a > mechanism to sequence the correct teardown of any active communication > channels. Which is exactly why the tools should delete one, and not the other. I arbitrarily chose the frontend for the case of the block devices. > Is hot-removal of devices supposed to be supported? If so, what's > the intended mechanism for this? Yes, it was one of the things I tested in the block device implementation (although I haven't checked since Christian's mods). Of course, the block device is not modular, and uses a static page, so teardown is overly simplistic in this case, but the theory seems sound... Hope that helps! Rusty. -- A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman _______________________________________________ Xen-tools mailing list Xen-tools@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-tools
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |