[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Igor Feoktistov <igorf@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 17:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 00:02:06 +0000
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

yep, disabling ARCH in Makefile and "make ARCH=xen" resolved this.
Thanks a lot!

>Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:49:05 +0100
>From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "Igor Feoktistov" <igorf@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Subject: [Xen-users] Badness in local_bh_enable at 
>> kernel/softirq.c:140
>> 
>> I'm getting subj trying to run linux-iscsi-4.0.2 on domain0.
>> I tried xen-2.0.6, xen-2-test and xen-3-devel. The same results.
>> I found similar complaints regarding this problem like below:
>> 
>> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0503.1/1622.html
>> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0503.1/1621.html
>> 
>> Not sure if it is xen or linux-iscsi related bug.
>> Any ideas how to cure it will be very appreciated.
>
>This is frequently a result of building an out-of-tree module without
>specifying ARCH=xen
>
>Ian
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-users mailing list
>Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.