[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] relation between vcpu and domain


  • To: Miguel Filipe <miguel.filipe@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Diwaker Gupta <diwaker.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:53:30 -0700
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:52:34 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UvRNU6v2ogaC7cU/KWQj1nPExpsZY3Ex73UCbe2mUNLprMK2cAphSSH5U3KlnW/EWgBrxJMZFc/5/PMi901tx01rLzIHmWsuN+qqcFRdStkLz7uPYXhwZ2MOdqWf4JDAryKTwQMxFkKlkj/ZPizY1VEjs08zprc10Qd3K4fpkxM=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

>  what you've said basically is a discription of a design to comprise that a
> VPU belongs to only one domain, but each domain can have several VPUs..
>  Why should a VPU migrate? From that description I would assume that VPUs
> don't migrate from domain.. but they (possibly) can be removed from a domain
> has long has this stays with at least one VPU, and can be added to a domain,
> if such vpu isn't assigned to a domain yet...

Not the VPU, I was suggesting perhaps the domain migrates from one
VCPU to another.

>  If that's true, there wouldn't be SMP for domains, since they are
> assossiated with only one VPU.

I thought SMP support for guests was still not functional. AFAIK,
domains are still pinned to a single CPU. Am I wrong?

It'll be great if someone with more authoritative knowledge can shed a
light on this :)

Diwaker
-- 
Web/Blog/Gallery: http://floatingsun.net

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.