[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] asterisk is working bad

  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: David Muench <davemuench@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:14:41 -0400
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:12:56 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZNWGx9LfgiZPXEKsOP5ezfnbfDOf3piLUTXx/jsDKh19jX5Huzn8wu4LFyk/WkFBT1mp0Vule/R2NU5PfinjUfmRiCi0OT8/Cx4ygn4UPxAV2MeHmTuUVHzCD93200IVcukrqv0/YNMyfLhCNC+rXXh5PrOrtA/xqC46+cYgnKw=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 8/22/05, Barry Flanagan <barryf-lists@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Asterisk is very sensitive to interrupts. I would not think it will work
> very well under Xen, given that Xen is trying to contend IRQs among
> different domains.

I've found that asterisk works very well under Xen in a pure VOIP
setup, ie: no PSTN cards or hardware that needs the zaptel driver. I'm
not clear if the original poster is using zaptel cards though.


David Muench - davemuench@xxxxxxxxx
Jabber ID: dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.