[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Asynchronous IO


  • To: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Priya PM <pmpriya@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:24:47 -0600
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 06:40:18 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=bb1VohEMBT2F0E83KhAYwXYdkYsyjuGHZyVMYY+EHenjDRHkuIMo6PL2XqzUPpcozTkODZ2IEZflsdX7D5AFoSOxzcd1uihQca9tuyMf8MmeB8jNuOETiy8HTO4ZFZKTihRVzZUzE7+Hocp6hFIxMI9jf6NXEofvNk2s+M8dl8g=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hi,
 
I have installed Xen on Linux 2.6.11.10 and i am trying to do Asynchronous Direct IO on SAS drives. The application which does the asynchronous direct io on SAS drive is running on Domain 0. Actually the IOPs what i get for a 512Bytes IO size is 67, but if i do the same operation on Linux 2.6.11.10 native kernel, i get 267 IOPs.Can anyone tell me why this huge differnece? Am i missing something? In the current setup on Xen, if i do Synchronous IO, then i am getting 265 IOPs which is expected. So i am wondering why Asynchronous IO should behave this way? Is there any reason??
 
Thanks,
Priya
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.