[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.0 - dom0 with 32bit userland vs domU with 64bit userland?

  • To: "Petersson, Mats" <mats.petersson@xxxxxxx>
  • From: Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:47:44 +1300
  • Cc: xen ml <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:45:23 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qwYOG8+tgDL8hSrz/PUanw+4iCWn2EmfwTzB7iIgVyJTqDR+Mjb12DCg4ElsNMSoUFBqLcCDApsDNEnoS2EcDtKaR6dY2/QLLHtLFiLC89LZyRkcvHC9ALWFZ1EyhcGJoMuUATULvEKNim41aDlKecsA/89Wu5ZpaYAKB3jgp8w=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
On 10/5/05, Petersson, Mats <mats.petersson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> at the moment, Virtualization hardware isn't publicly available from
> either AMD or Intel. I don't know what timescales this will be made
> available...

Going to require a whole new hardware set as well, plus the burn in
time while its tested before it becomes useful in production.

Being able to mix 32 and 64 userlands is probably just as useful at
the moment.  Means I can run a well test solid 32bit userland dom0,
and do all the flaky 64bit userland testing in reusable domUs.


--
Nicholas Lee
http://stateless.geek.nz
gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF  5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.