[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Dual Core processor options


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Simon <greminn@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:29:00 +1300
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:29:46 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lwB/gTX5aNkDsIPOim4TOzRirtDpXwCNHx9mFY+A2lXQ6Xz1xNpip8ZRivcXoNR224QQiM/4dMhhEwMltP2lIf5BE2DYmbP8b7xXKo29pIwdBYWdieyrxGEht1u1gr5DMfBp9OI2LY5yBlAOPz6A5NvXvqy0VJnw3k2/4Pn++6I=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 07 Dec 2005 23:38:40 +0000, M.A. Williamson <maw48@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yes, that'd work. You can put domUs on any logical processor (hyperthread,
> core, real CPU package...). If the domUs are SMP you can spread them across
> several logical processors.
>
> Bear in mind dom0 has to go somewhere though ;-) On hyperthreaded systems
> there's a benefit to allowing dom0 its own hyperthread so that it's never
> context switched and is always available for servicing IO requests.

dom0 services the IO (disk, ethernet etc) for all the domU's?

>
> On a multicore without HT, you might have it share a core with domUs, or
> dedicate a core - depending on your expected IO load.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.