[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] 3.0.0: tg3 & sata_sil crashes


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 03:29:47 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 02:36:00 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Gbz8dhrF5v4MNNrptPbhRmy3Aj6TpiQS4KM4r5/X7erpjcAWeL8F1MW89X5Q7TNqR5XTTbLD7xcviZXGT4VIKrREM95BmOJGg9wGTsd+hKXI4P67DP1geaEj+mjryfL0RdBGFapSy8gSnB2ASD9V/nnZ4ODCYFD3zdgZUPUsZrU=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hello,

I get the following in dmesg when booting dom0 under xen-3.0.0.
If someone could explain why I'd very much appreciate it :-).

1.)
Looks bad enough, but the SATA disks are usable, so apparently not critical:

kobject_register failed for sata_sil (-17)

Call Trace:
<ffffffff801ef976>{kobject_register+70}
<ffffffff80243dab>{bus_add_driver+107}
<ffffffff801fc063>{pci_register_driver+131}
<ffffffff80151915>{sys_init_module+325}
<ffffffff80112406>{system_call+134}
<ffffffff80112380>{system_call+0}


2.)
Not sure why tg3 is mentioned below - when I cat /proc/interrupts,
only ohci_hcd seems to be using irq 19.  In fact, tg3 (tigon3) doesn't
seem to have any interrupts assigned, but then again the network
adapter seems to be working fine anyway.

irq 19: nobody cared!

Call Trace:
<ffffffff80155250>{__report_bad_irq+48}
<ffffffff80155329>{note_interrupt+89}
<ffffffff80154b5c>{__do_IRQ+252}
<ffffffff80115f04>{do_IRQ+52}
<ffffffff8010db65>{evtchn_do_upcall+197}
<ffffffff880349b0>{:bridge:br_handle_frame_finish+0}
<ffffffff80112cf1>{do_hypervisor_callback+17}
<ffffffff8010da2c>{force_evtchn_callback+12}
<ffffffff8010da2c>{force_evtchn_callback+12}
<ffffffff8800cfe1>{:tg3:tg3_interrupt_tagged+417}
<ffffffff80154a0c>{handle_IRQ_event+76}
<ffffffff80154b3c>{__do_IRQ+220}
<ffffffff80115f04>{do_IRQ+52}
<ffffffff8011a5fe>{monotonic_clock+78}
<ffffffff8010db65>{evtchn_do_upcall+197}<ffffffff80112cf1>{do_hypervisor_callback+17}
<ffffffff8011035a>{xen_idle+106}
<ffffffff8011035a>{xen_idle+106}
<ffffffff801103aa>{cpu_idle+58}
<ffffffff804c871a>{start_kernel+490}
<ffffffff804c819a>{_sinittext+410}

handlers:
[<ffffffff802a80e0>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x70)
[<ffffffff802a80e0>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x70)

Disabling IRQ #19


Hope that someone can bring me up to date.

Btw, out of curiosity, I'm wondering what the "+100" etc. numbers above mean.
Is it a byte offset into my particular compilation of the source code?
If that's the case, is that actually useful to anyone?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.