[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] VT or paravirtualization?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Czakó Krisztián <slapic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:03:03 +0100
Delivery-date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:12:22 +0000
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hello,

What is the better solution now to run linux domUs under Xen3?
Using a VT hardware, sould I install a xen-patched kernel as I would
where no VT extension, or use an unmodified linux guest system?

Is there any performance difference between a Pentium D 3 Ghz with vt
(9xx) and without it (8xx)? 

Regards,
Slapic



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-users] VT or paravirtualization?
  - From: Mark Williamson

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Ubuntu: "no more processes left in this runlevel"
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Xen and iSCSI
Previous by thread: [Xen-users] Networking: Simple steps
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-users] VT or paravirtualization?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.