Re: [Xen-users] VT or paravirtualization?

[Daniel Stekloff <dsteklof@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sunday 29 January 2006 05:59, Adam Wendt wrote:
> As far as I can tell using a xen patched kernel is FAR superior to running
> unmodified linux, I can crash a VMX linux guest in a few minutes with just
> some network stress tests (which also eat up 100% cpu of guest and host).
>
> Stick with xen-patched non-VT linux guests is my suggestion.


I agree, especially considering the current ioemu device model for VT guests.

Thanks,

Dan



> Adam Wendt
> IPCoast, Inc.
>
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:03 , Czakï_Krisztiïn <slapic@xxxxxxxxxxx> sent:
> >Hello,
> >
> >What is the better solution now to run linux domUs under Xen3?
> >Using a VT hardware, sould I install a xen-patched kernel as I would
> >where no VT extension, or use an unmodified linux guest system?
> >
> >Is there any performance difference between a Pentium D 3 Ghz with vt
> >(9xx) and without it (8xx)?
> >
> >Regards,
> >Slapic
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Xen-users mailing list
> >Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users