[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Re: an attempt to explain xen networking

  • To: Patrick Wolfe <pwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:07:33 +0000
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:24:58 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ChG59uB5RTbZidlI3BhGQg4xL8omsPWzXo6MLXEyC7i21q2FIqP+SSQuDxPHmcNAlSP+hk3SNvn5SBm/8PxJrvOXskvJcAQuW8J0xGz3JA+PL88eP3VkefH34RnsWhJDzPYz2byUTgdmPSSZHqBuXhHM/euuSATBvP4fJYLdwUk=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Patrick Wolfe wrote:


Might I add some tiny suggestions?

 * Move domU outside of dom0?  What's it doing there?
 * Name the domU "Linux domU #4", to illustrate that the VIF number
derives from the domU #.
   (The current double "VIF #4" vs. "vif4" makes the "VIF #4" superfluous)
 * Remove the "Debian" wording, it's not important.

 * (again,) while domU living inside of dom0 may be correct for some
technical reason (RAM?), it seems confusing on a network diagram..
 * (again,) the wording "Linux domU #4" would be preferable to "Linux
domU VIF #4", IMHO at least.

Super cool work, thanks a lot.

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.