Re: [Xen-users] Xen domains not replying to arp requests

[Digvijoy Chatterjee <digvijoy_chatterjee@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Braulio : that was exactly the problem , i got it sorted now ,

On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 11:09 -0200, BrÃulio Gergull wrote:
> On Feb 09, 2006 05:42 AM, Digvijoy Chatterjee
> <digvijoy_chatterjee@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi List,
> >
> > I am running FC4-2.6.11-1.1369_Xen0 as my Dom-0 and
> > FC4-2.6.11-1.1369XenU as my domains and Xen shipped with Fedora
> >
> > this is how the picture is :
> > [root@Aarya ~]# xm list
> > Name              Id  Mem(MB)  CPU  State  Time(s)  Console
> > Cluster-1          3      255        1      -b---     43.1        9603
> > Cluster-2          4      255        1      -b---     41.5        9604
> > Domain-0        0       256        0      r----    155.4       
> >
> > now my Domain-0 has two network cards , i am intending to setup a
> > virtual private network in this way
> >
> >                 Dom-0 eth0(172.25.243.133/27)----connected to outside
> > world( bcast 172.25.243.159)
> >                           /|
> >                            | (echo 1>> /proc/sys/net/ipv4_forward )
> >                 Dom-0 eth1(10.10.1.1/24)(bcast 10.10.1.255)
> >                             |
> >                             | 
> >                             |   
> >                             |     Cluster-2 eth0(10.10.1.3/24) ,bcast
> > 10.10.1.255 ,
> >                             |       
> >                       Cluster-1 eth0(10.10.1.2/24) ,bcast 10.10.1.255
> >
> > ping from Cluster-1 to Cluster-2 to vice versa is working , but i am
> > not
> > able to ping from the Dom-0 eth1 to Cluster-1/Cluster-2 or  the other
> > way,..
> > tcpdump output says the xen domains are not able to give arp replies
> > for
> > requests as you can see below . for example
> >      
> > [root@Cluster-1 ~]# ping 10.10.1.1 ( hangs forever , 100%
> > packet lost on interrupting)
> > PING 10.10.1.1 (10.10.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> >
> > [root@Aarya ~]# tcpdump -i eth1 |grep '10.10.1.2'
> > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol
> > decode
> > listening on eth2, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
> > 12:57:06.682653 arp who-has 10.10.1.2 tell 10.10.1.1
> > 12:57:08.682647 arp who-has 10.10.1.2 tell 10.10.1.1
> > 12:57:09.682647 arp who-has 10.10.1.2 tell 10.10.1.1
> > 12:57:10.682648 arp who-has 10.10.1.2 tell 10.10.1.1
> > 12:57:12.682647 arp who-has 10.10.1.2 tell 10.10.1.1
> > 12:57:13.682648 arp who-has 10.10.1.2 tell 10.10.1.1
> > 12:57:14.682659 arp who-has 10.10.1.2 tell 10.10.1.1
> >
> > My Dom-0 ifconfig output is like this
> > [root@Aarya ~]# ifconfig
> > eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0E:0C:5E:AE:AB 
> >           inet addr:172.25.243.133  Bcast:172.25.243.159
> > Mask:255.255.255.224
> >           inet6 addr: fe80::20e:cff:fe5e:aeab/64 Scope:Link
> >           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >           RX packets:265697 errors:5 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:5
> >           TX packets:220098 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >           collisions:101248 txqueuelen:1000
> >           RX bytes:362665597 (345.8 MiB)  TX bytes:33895510 (32.3 MiB)
> >
> > eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:C0:9F:47:1A:6B 
> >           inet addr:10.10.1.1  Bcast:10.10.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> >           inet6 addr: fe80::2c0:9fff:fe47:1a6b/64 Scope:Link
> >           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >           RX packets:316967 errors:10 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:10
> >           TX packets:723 errors:4 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:4
> >           collisions:553 txqueuelen:1000
> >           RX bytes:289280232 (275.8 MiB)  TX bytes:48548 (47.4 KiB)
> >           Base address:0xece0 Memory:fe2e0000-fe300000
> >
> > lo        Link encap:Local Loopback 
> >           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
> >           inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> >           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
> >           RX packets:18715 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >           TX packets:18715 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >           RX bytes:5463365 (5.2 MiB)  TX bytes:5463365 (5.2 MiB)
> >
> > vif3.0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF 
> >           inet6 addr: fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 Scope:Link
> >           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >           RX packets:488 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >           TX packets:113 errors:0 dropped:5 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >           RX bytes:46202 (45.1 KiB)  TX bytes:9648 (9.4 KiB)
> >
> > vif4.0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF 
> >           inet6 addr: fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 Scope:Link
> >           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >           RX packets:573 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >           TX packets:101 errors:0 dropped:5 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >           RX bytes:54616 (53.3 KiB)  TX bytes:8444 (8.2 KiB)
> >
> > xen-br0   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF 
> >           inet addr:172.25.243.133  Bcast:172.25.243.159
> > Mask:255.255.255.255
> >           inet6 addr: fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 Scope:Link
> >           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >           RX packets:919 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >          TX packets:34 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >           RX bytes:74613 (72.8 KiB)  TX bytes:1596 (1.5 KiB)
> >
> > Can anyone help as to why the domains are not giving arp replies or
> > how
> > best to set up my network
> >
> > TIA
> > Digz
> >
>
>
> Hi Digz,
>
> It seems that your vif's are attached to the wrong bridge. What's the
> output of:
>
> # brctl show
>
> in dom0?
>
> Since I don't see any xen-br1 in your setup I assume they're attached to
> xen-br0, which is not what you want.
>
> For the sake of simplicity you can just switch eth0 and eth1 in Dom0,
> ie:
>
> eth0 -> 10.10.1.1
> eth1 -> 172.25.243.133
>
> Then your vif's would attach to eth0 (in fact to xen-br0) without
> touching the scripts.
>
> Otherwise you would have to change the scripts to create xen-br1 and
> attach eth1 and your vif's to it.
>
> []s,
> Braulio Gergull
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users



**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely 
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please 
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are 
not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other 
person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. 
Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not 
liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. 
You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or 
attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all 
messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this 
e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users