[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-users] doubts: hardware access overhead on domUs, desktop environment layout
> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Eduardo Costa Lisboa > Sent: 10 February 2006 16:11 > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Xen-users] doubts: hardware access overhead on > domUs, desktop environment layout > > Hi, guys. I am new to Xen but already work (should I say > play?) with it enough to know the basics of it's characteristics. > > My questions are the following: > > - is there much overhead on accessing hardware via a domU, > like a graphics card? Not if the version of Xen you're using allows you to give the PCI device to the DomU - there's no difference between a DomU accessing a device and Dom0 accessing the device - it's just whatever CPU operation that the original hardware requires, either IO operations like OUT/IN or reguler memory operations (mov instructions). Currently, however, Xen 3.0 doesn't allow the PCI device to be "given" to DomU. Further, currently, graphics is one of the devices that may not be trivial to pass over to the DomU, since you will need to have Dom0 handle the graphics until you've got a DomU - and now what do you do with the Dom0's handle to the graphics card and any possibly outstanding requests from the Dom0 graphics driver to the hardware - some careful handshaking is needed here, and stock drivers don't undetrstand this need: most drivers do not understand hotpluggable graphics cards, which is the model we'd have to work along. It may be possible to pass a "powersave" event to the driver and get it to unload itself, but some work is defintely needed for this - it's certainly not in place today. [After writing the above, I realized you've already discussed it below - that's what you get from not reading the entire post before writing the answer. I think there's still some interesting ideas on the why not/solutions above]. > > - I am planning to use Xen on my notebook, so I could learn a > bit more and even boot my other distro's without rebooting > and stuff; so, would it be better to have a idle dom0 and a > main desktop on a domU or use the dom0 itself as the graphic > desktop environment? I think you'll HAVE to use Dom0 to run the graphics. > > I have heard that if I gave to a domU direct control of a > video card, I wouldn't be able to use it on my dom0. Thus, I > should have two video cards, one for each one of the domains. > Is it correct? And, can I even have 3D acceleration (on X, > via NVIDIA's proprietary driver) on a domU? Yes, two graphics cards would work, assuming you have a Xen that can pass a PCI device to the DomU. Probably not if you're running a para-virtualized DomU - as I think nVidia's driver doesn't work in Dom0 because it's different enough to regular Linux. On the other hand, if you're running a fully virtualized domain, any driver that can handle the hardware should be fair game. Again, conditions mentioned above still apply. -- Mats > > Thanks in advance, > > > -- > Eduardo Costa Lisboa > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |