[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] internal-br vs xenbr0. networking issue


  • To: "Markus Hochholdinger" <Markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Nicholas Lee" <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:07:23 +1300
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:20:27 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LQtDa8rJBFfmgbeLmrdn6J0ge8Yicnx59px0Aur6YTTQ07DeKhX+aBCUmLkWwh7HPOcbjGWiIL/QlG4yupVN/0lmd7KjM6l/Jeex/cVLT3Cc853hT9A3t2vYCnP4BHoadzFu05bVY8qHCnENtoQD7SSxUsh45L9V9RqaK8HVi0s=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 19/02/06, Markus Hochholdinger <Markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> sounds to me like a similar problem i had have. Just check arp! Each layer two
> deivce must have a unique mac address. Check if you have not specified one
> mac address twice.

I had that problem before when I specified a 13 digit MAC address.  So
that was one of the things I checked a copule times.

Plus since its a (mulitple) bridge, duplicate MACs would cause the
same problem for all systems on the same subnet.  Ping would also have
some issues.

No I think its something wrong on the tcp layer.


--
Nicholas Lee
http://stateless.geek.nz
gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF  5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.