[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] differences compiling sources between xenU and xen0

  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Konstantinos Pachopoulos <kostaspaxos@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:28:51 +0000 (GMT)
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:29:24 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.gr; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=0UYiC+80LX6yX0Od2gn1gO2TUrMD1aULfFxf25b1DUwZS18QHYz/sAb1X71EqfmeWqRveAI1St15C1V1gUII2YjzhWNVJQYml2CLtm3aaVf70eKCJ/NDjlj95f/CWtovqnpVZAZYBp/TfuWg06M+jtq6Fx4M2AiqD5KVFGxcqpE= ;
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

i am not quite sure. I download the kernel source and
the patch it with xen.
In order for this source to be used for xen0, i do
"make ARCH=xen menuconfig" and then choose the
"priviliged domain" option and the options, which
correspond to my hardware.
In order for this same (patched) source to be used for
xenU now, i do "make ARCH=xen menuconfig", do not
choose the "priviliged domain" option and choose none
of  the physical device drivers.
Am i right?

Yahoo! Photos ? NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo 

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.