[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Bridging and VLANs 802.1Q trunk

  • To: "Matus Harvan" <m.harvan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Brian Wong" <bwlist@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:38:19 -0500
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:39:18 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VWXkhtBnX4zc1sTuKC0nQhl/+Ar3MzhBgTKy9N+nekOh4f4E2LxJtL5zYo+nqXOcXOvPXBWS6W4HeOQyWPaUdI9kd7FggBYdIlelQSBqu0r65t2UPWMtonX0sb2x90xAm6zwbEhwSD91mZY9R4Q/zuVu4Fi1DQKJ8If2m/ekRlY=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 3/8/06, Matus Harvan <m.harvan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:23:34PM -0500, Javier Guerra wrote:
> [snip]
> > i think it's easier to 'untag' the VLANs in dom0, so you would have several
> > eth0.x, and then put those in several bridges, connecting to the appropriate
> > vif's; just like having several physical eth cards.
> >
> > for that to work, you'd have to use the physical eth0, not the 'virtualized'
> > eth0 you have after the Xen scripts do their magic.
> Hello,
> I have tried to add an eth0.x interface into a xen bridge using the
> network-bridge script, but could not get it running. Have you (or anyone
> else on the list) actually managed to do something like that?

Ive been tinkering with it all day and havent been able to get it to work.

This doesnt seem to work because the script brings down the 'netdev'
and when that device is 'eth0.X' where X is the vlan, it totally
removes it. Then the script later tries to rename it to peth0.X but
the 'eth0.X' no longer exists.

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.