[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-users] Re: Basic Xen Questions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Randy Thelen on Monday 20 Mar 2006 12:45 wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > >> 1) If I patch my kernel with Xen, will I be compromising on any of >> the other >> features that I've patched ? (Namely UML and swsusp. I use UML a lot) > > swsusp: Software Suspend > http://sourceforge.net/projects/swsusp > > It's unlikely this will work with Xen. This would undoubtedly > require a patch into the Xen hypervisor to save & restore the other > domains. Even if you were only running dom0, this might still not work. > > UML: User Mode Linux > Interesting. UML is a technology which accomplishes some of the same > goals as Xen. Xen can run multiple instances of Linux, like UML. So > from that stand point, you'll get many of the same features as UML. > However, Xen can also run other operating systems: FreeBSD, NetBSD, > Minix (in theory), Windows XP (with the right processor), etc. > Thanks for replying. Basically I'm looking to build the kernel with all support. I want a kernel with Xen support which I can use for UML too when I'm not running any other domU (other OSes in Xen) want. Right now my kernels are patched with UML but I don't use UML always. I use it only when I want, else my machine runs as a normal machine. > It's my opinion that Xen is a superset of the functionality one can > get with UML. If UML is important to you, I encourage you to > continue learning about the virtues of Xen. > > The answer to the question: "will I be compromising on any of the > other features?" is yes. > >> 2) So when I boot with a Xen kernel, the OS it boots into is dom0 >> which >> simply is my normal OS. Right ? > > More or less. However, the Linux running as dom0 will likely not be > the same -kernel- image that you are currently running. But, it will > be Linux and it will see your current file systems, devices (assuming > your configuration files are suitably identical), etc. > So basically it'd be the same kernel with Xen features? >> 3) If I'm correct about Question 2 then, "when only using dom0, >> does it add >> any virtualization overhead to the host OS i.e. dom0 ? Or does it >> simply >> function as a normal Linux Kernel with Xen features not being in >> use ? " > > It does add overhead to use Xen even with only dom0 present, but > they're minimal. It's likely you won't notice them. Various > presentations indicate the performance impact is as low as 3%. > > -- Randy That's good. 3% overhead is worth trying Xen. :-) Thanks, Ritesh - -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." "Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEHl0R4Rhi6gTxMLwRAplEAJ98LEtw/KkIvbNvcLCE3yM5oOnRuACdGwvE kp1Wy7l1uEMa/OUufIDJB+c= =p/tT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |