[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Moved from Xen 2 to Xen 3... some questions..
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:25:35PM +0100, George Styles wrote: > Ive got it working, but I want to ask a couple of questions about it. I can't help with all of them, but I'll answer a couple of your questions. > 1. There no longer seems to be a seperate DomU and Dom0 built when I build > from source. Is this the new policy? this would suit me, as I always used > Xen0 kernels in my guest domains anyway. Yes. You can still build seperate kernels if you wish, but it is no longer the default. > 5. Is there ANY way to see the pre-linux-kernel messages from boot (the > messages from the hypervisor)? they scroll past so quickly I cannot read > them, then if I get a kernel panic when the Linux kernel starts, I cannot > see what the hypervisor was saying. It turned out to be lack of sata > drivers in the kernel (they were modules), but that was guesswork. Im sure > the Xen boot messages would tell me what hardware it had picked up. xm dmesg > 6. When I was trying to build a custom kernel (with the sata drivers in), > i tried the usual > make ARCH=xen menuconfig > in the linux source dir, but it gave an error (something about no such > target or somesuch). > Is this no longer nescesary? it worked OK when I ommitted the ARCH=xen, > but I didnt proceed as I wasnt sure if it would compile in the Xen > stuff... whats going on??? Yes Xen is no longer a sub-arch, and has been merged into the normal system. So you can exclude it as you did with safety. Steve -- http://www.steve.org.uk/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |