[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Minimal Hypervisor Size?


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Dave Cameron <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:33:06 -0500 (CDT)
  • Date-warning: Date header was inserted by vms048.mailsrvcs.net
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:34:10 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

> What about hardware support, you'd still need some way to emulate
> hardware or it wouldn't be a whole lot of use. You'd have to rip a whole
> chunk of code out of Linux or BSD.
> 
> On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 16:13 -0500, dfeustel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > How large would a hypervisor be if it were constructed
> > as the smallest program supporting the virtualization of
> > unmodified operating systems only (i.e. no linux-specific
> > features, no para-virtualization)?

Would not the hardware support need to be OS-independent in order
to work with the (unspecified) unmodified operating systems?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.