[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Question
- To: "James Morris" <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Corey B" <corkbob@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:23:00 -0700
- Cc: Tony Breeds <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:23:59 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=EOFjUFdgxXm9btolP8XVBnTWrGA61Zji+epXWI1/JGq/RuALj3zCRozK4ryMa2q8W+H5mOAZYg8bk5kBj6tExnfowUZ/VZz17SMlbWwSOgU5WzMfoOgL6ISFgSX7FckfyCTPeDfHjmkZBGs4uos94blB8JH4hE+AV1mhedTRdbU=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
The person at bugzilla recommended that i upgrade to the most recent selinux policy. How and where do i do that?
Thanks
On 8/16/06, James Morris <
jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 11:36:59AM -0400, James Morris wrote:
>
> > Please don't tell people to add selinux=0 to "fix" problems with SELinux
> > policy. It just papers over the real issue and the developers don't find
> > out what needs fixing.
>
> Hi James,
> I understand your position. If you read the rest of my original
> I did suggest that if this helped Corey B should seek help on fixing his
> selinux policy from more knowledgable folks.
Yes, you're right, sorry.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
