[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Differences in performance between file and LVM based images.


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Arjun <cse.syslab@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:33:31 -0400
  • Cc: Ligesh <myself@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:34:17 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=L9UXW/miK8ww/QpkDoY/LNai2hQSbXS2A5LPTzItoqZE+kUcYygjIjHNGZAq4MCV4vb9FejYvOfCUiGFtpbkBapJxsLWNM9jzIirhvA4jAdQFIFQZNokO9/RkTrQ9L0n/Amw4LBCDCkhY0FBihFQpkv8bvITiDhgUnUomzM/sHc=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

We had done some webserver tests using file based images instead of LVM. This was on Xen 3.0.0.
As I remember, we didn't have any significant difference between the performance on Xen with file based image and Linux with physical (normal) disk.

regds
Arjun



On 8/23/06, Ligesh <myself@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello folks,

How much is the performance penalty if you use a file instead of an LVM? Has there been any benchmarks on this?

Thanks.

--
:: Ligesh :: http://ligesh.com



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.