Re: [Xen-users] Routing with Xen-Bridge

[Tom Mornini <tmornini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It depends on netmasks and, therefore, netmasks.

If your netmask for all these 192.168 system is 255.255.0.0 then there's
no need for routing at all.

You mentioned Xen-Bridge in the subject. It's a bridge, not a  
router. :-)
On Oct 15, 2006, at 2:59 AM, Gerhard Wendebourg wrote:

> after I was now successful with setting up my Xen-System, the question
> about the routing directed to the guest-systems:
>
> I have now the Dom-0 connected to the 192.168.0.0 (=> Inet), own IP
> 192.168.0.10 and the bridge and guests running on 192.168.1.0. My
> xenbridge runs on 192.168.1.1.
>
> If I now want to have one guest-domain, running on 192.168.1.22 to be
> reached by HTTP and SSH, how do I handle the forwarding coming to my
> Dom-0 at 192.168.0.10 to the Guest-domain at a specific port?
--
-- Tom Mornini, CTO
-- Engine Yard, Ruby on Rails Hosting
-- Reliability, Ease of Use, Scalability
-- (866) 518-YARD (9273)


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users