Re: [Xen-users] limitation of 3 virtual network interfaces

[Christian Hergert <christian.hergert@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Doing the vlans in the domU instead of in bridges in the dom0 seems to
work. Thanks Fajar.

- -- Christian

Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Christian Hergert wrote:
>> Can this be worked around? My virtual routers need upwards of 15-20
>> vif's and I was hoping to upgrade them this weekend. Looks like ill be
>> going back down to 3.0.2 for now.
> I believe you can use VLANs. I tested the 3.0.3 64 bit binary tarball
> briefly and it seems to support VLANs on domU out-of-the box.
>
> Regards,
>
> Fajar
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFVEQcJ8Qu7UaHlggRAucVAKDMK83FnCR3LZrIQjt2AE3hCmiywACg1zfZ
k47RaZSKg9SohQWn1qoXQq0=
=XZBK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users