[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] xen, iscsi and resilience to short network outages


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Steve Feehan" <sfeehan@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:05:29 -0500
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:05:49 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LlRa91Cfy95c+OAA65h0G4iXV3GwHSd80SEtlYDGThAGtjihTRA2K5voX9loYWwHt1q7Se1+MDR14Q+68KIQpq0bKXTqTiZPClYmXOVWa2nm6r9kbNrpegBdq9PHohQtLmAINTHUor+R1U3F6X9TALsP0JpLh8MMxc095b5fKT4=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 11/13/06, Tom Brown <tbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

pushing the iscsi to dom0 means you're abstracting the disk and the domU
can not know about iscsi timeouts, retries etc.

pushing the iscsi to domU means you can do live migration, and your dom0
is much simpler and should be more stable.

Live migration works in the iscsi in domU case also. You just have to be
very careful to limit access to the LUN and use a consisten device
name (ie. the ones provided by udev in /dev/disk/*).

I've never used iscsi, so I can't really comment about retries, recoveries
etc... but if the dom0 can recover, I would think that the domU could _if_
it knew it was handling iSCSI, but that's just a guess.

Well, I'm convinced it's worth a try. When I can spare some time to
experiment I'll try both the root on NFS and iscsi in domU
configurations and report back to the list with my results.

Thanks,

--
Steve Feehan

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.