[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] vmplayer on xen guest


  • To: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Henning Sprang" <henning_sprang@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:29:10 +0100
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 05:29:18 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=md3ApbKVLV5B/glKrscl0mezfwt8+GkiC03Zqo5hODKYp7sPoyF1W/jXgnrc5k+MHDe0+53hovfevvryGi8Q/4R6jrPBpGmC7s+TsU2ddio0YQi1mxVF5l6RCmAUA8JTEDBhPgN9rGMjTXkm+UBqTLFQAhBRvpQPKz9yK/0Vwo0=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 12/6/06, Ulrich Windl <ulrich.windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Q: If XEN is using hardware virtualization, VMware shouldn't know that it's
running virtualized, and should provide classical virtualization. Is that right?

In theorie, yes.
In practice, you can try, and your mileage may vary.

If the HVM guest OS _would_ see a 100% "normal" system, all the *BSD's
would also work. But they don't (see threads about this) - for some
low-level hardware access reason I cannot explain right now (I think
it's explained in the *BSD threads) - but that's how it is currently.

Henning

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.