[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] OpenBSD 4.0 HVM guest


  • To: "Luca Corti" <luca@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Henning Sprang" <henning_sprang@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:23:12 +0100
  • Cc: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:23:14 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Uj7CBw4YrcrFtJBrgquKyneVmoeXMI1E0qUOS+wCXDqfFuctByJchFUWqT4ks32Tu13N92leoz5d+Zg/+om1gPGtQurp6wGWqoikfR6bk/jytuRlnWgWV1sxUS6uohIDbTgSvlSDQw6njl4NUTxa9JUa/zvQ8b59xuvk9e8IZto=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 12/16/06, Luca Corti <luca@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
What about the domU port? Is it useable? Have you tried it?

I didn't play with OpenBSD paravirtualized (BTW: it's paravirtulized
vs. hvm/hardware-supported virtualization, both are domUs)
The NetBSD Port to paravirtualized Xen DomU seems tu run fine - O.K. I
did only install it, and had no time to explore it much yet.

Is there any
noticeable performance diference between domUs and HVMs?

There are quite some factors involved, and I think it cannot be said
in general if hvm is faster than paravirtualized.

Henning

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.