[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU...

  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Jerry Amundson" <jamundso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:10:14 -0600
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:09:40 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L2/dWf7IAWeLk+9BTqAuIs/rOntXFoR4PGTOLPAZJ0qUfc3DbwJ/OfeE5seZ5WEcbwdnNSpYFo3JLsV5RMYZSjZ5+BcU+J1HJjifDM4wxo/5OkKV87XW9d5KnJRjLgaerftQk3p0s1SN1mJzwAltvThmvEUL4btA+jDTK8Ysyyo=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 2/24/07, Kraska, Joe A (US SSA) <joe.kraska@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ran across this problem recently. Below attached worked for me on a
> > reboot. Still gathering "low level linux administration expertise"
> > here. Would one alternative to the modprobe.conf be to recompile the
> > domU kernel such that it needs no such modprobe entry?

> Yes, but why? Having it there keeps the install "more normal"...

Fair response. OTOH, it's not normal for me to have to make manual
modprobe.conf entries when installing a redhat OS. Will contemplate
the implications overall. Thank you.

Agreed. And that's a packaging problem. The rpm should have udev
awareness added to it so the "usual" device magic is done, even though
the device is virtual...


"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!"

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.