[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Strange Networking Issue
Some things aren't adding up here. When your provider set up your machine they configured 75.126.153.178/29 on eth0. But when they allocated you your extra addresses, what did they say exactly - what did they tell you the subnet mask was, did they mention an additional gateway address, etc. Also, if I was to ask you to actually change the address on eth1, would you still have access to the box via eth0? On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:44:45PM -0500, Jonathon Jones wrote: > jez wrote: > >On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:08:28PM -0500, Jonathon Jones wrote: > > > >Hi Jon, > > > >your first post says that additional IPs on eth0 in Dom1 are /32 not /22 - > >which is it? > > > Tried it both ways and more. I added it as /22 recently simply to show > that it is consistent with a working IP, .240 > >Also, can you fill in the details on the following: > > > >1. "ip addr show" on Dom0 > > > [root@trinity domU]# ip addr show > 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo > inet6 ::1/128 scope host > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 2: vif0.0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop > link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 3: veth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop > link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 4: vif0.1: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue > link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 5: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue > link/ether 00:30:48:78:d6:07 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 75.126.153.178/29 brd 75.126.153.183 scope global eth1 > inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe78:d607/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 6: vif0.2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop > link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 7: veth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop > link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 8: vif0.3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop > link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 9: veth3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop > link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 10: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:30:48:78:d6:06 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 10.10.16.2/26 brd 10.10.16.63 scope global eth0 > inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe78:d606/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 11: peth1: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 > link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 12: sit0: <NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop > link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0 > 13: xenbr1: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue > link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 14: vif1.0: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 32 > link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 15: vif2.0: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 32 > link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > >2. "brctl show" on Dom0 > > > [root@trinity domU]# brctl show > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > xenbr1 8000.feffffffffff no peth1 > vif0.1 > vif1.0 > vif2.0 > >3. "route -n" on Dom0 > > > [root@trinity domU]# route -n > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > Iface > 75.126.153.176 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth1 > 10.10.16.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U 0 0 0 eth0 > 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 > 10.0.0.0 10.10.16.1 255.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 > 0.0.0.0 75.126.153.177 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 > >4. The vif configurations for Dom1 and Dom2 (from their config files) > > > In Dom1: > [root@secure network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0 > # Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt > # for the documentation of these parameters. > TYPE=Ethernet > DEVICE=eth0 > BOOTPROTO=static > ONBOOT=yes > IPADDR=75.126.154.240 > NETMASK=255.255.252.0 > GATEWAY=75.126.153.177 > [root@secure network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0-range0 > IPADDR_START=75.126.154.241 > IPADDR_END=75.126.154.243 > CLONENUM_START=0 > NETMASK=255.255.252.0 > > Note: I have been using ip addr add/del to test the IP's out but for > simplicity I added them using the range config above. Neither way is > working. I also have my ISP checking on whether this is a routing issue > on their side, although I don't see hwo it could be when .240 and .244 > are routing to Dom1 and Dom2 respectively. > > In Dom2: > [root@secure network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0 > # Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt > # for the documentation of these parameters. > TYPE=Ethernet > DEVICE=eth0 > BOOTPROTO=static > ONBOOT=yes > IPADDR=75.126.154.244 > NETMASK=255.255.252.0 > GATEWAY=75.126.153.177 > > [root@secure network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0-range0 > IPADDR_START=75.126.154.245 > IPADDR_END=75.126.154.247 > CLONENUM_START=0 > NETMASK=255.255.252.0 > >5. The settings for (network-script ...) and (vif-script ...) in your > > xend configuration file. > > > In Dom1: > vif = [ '' ] > In Dom2: (as an experiment which didn't change anything) > vif = [ 'ip=75.126.154.244' ] > > Neither DomU has any other network settings in the config. > >6. The version of xen you are running. > > > xen-3.0.4_1-install-x86_32p.tgz is the file I downloaded form xensource.com > uname reports 2.6.16.33-xen #1 SMP Mon Jan 8 14:39:10 GMT 2007 i686 > athlon i386 GNU/Linux > >Depending on what you come back with, I might have more questions. > > > >Also, do you have any idea if you would prefer a bridged or a routed > >setup? > > > >jez > > > > > I prefer bridged simply because it seems the most simple setup > normally. I am open to suggestions but I am looking for the easiest to > maintain because I am frankly not a networking guru...although I am > learning a lot from this. > > Thanks much! > > Jon > >_______________________________________________ > >Xen-users mailing list > >Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |