[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] file-backed vs. block device performance


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Mark Greenbank" <mark.greenbank@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:12:28 -0400
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:11:25 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=HWuHrzMb4dkCE0z5h2ZJHAjIVTnckUJpNVZVJXiP1gtfZDqP5VEMyg31fqzVIao7lJfZPt3Mkyg+hfI+emGFM0r4LOvuDZxP58T7oTex08OAYz9eSVJfYpH0PJ9xu4vuZJxtPaG3GXWZCNqVmI3fxFGNrpfWO/WyJnWlaJ1g2Uw=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hi,

I searched the archives and I couldn't find a thread with specific metrics or benchmark results for file-backed VBD vs. raw disk partitions. Does anyone know any good links?

mark

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.