[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Compile Question


  • To: Jayson Vantuyl <jvantuyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 00:11:15 +0100
  • Cc: Dylan Martin <dmartin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>, Xen Users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:06:52 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cP5JWLCI2TJbw7gdCLVXBHTbRK9mnXIUbT29tRTyz1++l1l9uOaGTVa5WcXErpG3cEW7n1G/CMvdpD5WOQ7x2PgjkyE7rfOI2VYmu8rUweJgIZVWsVvjFO+5NuKo3kF25wSkckm9Sy7DnSVpDnfKk+dOMv0ChRT05aRk/ZuSYa0=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Jayson Vantuyl wrote:
Very much.

On May 23, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Dylan Martin wrote:

Fedora 7 includes a 2.6.20 kernel with xen 3.1.0.  I'm going to look
at the source and see what they did.
Do you think other people would be interested in what I find?

-Dylan
Please do! The kernels in RHEL 4.5 are.... unfortunately stuck in the stone ages at 2.6.9, and I'm not impressed with what RHEL 5 did to manipulate virt-install and virt-manager into insisting on the /dev/xdv* disk images. The Xensource.com downloadable Xen 3.1.0 kernels are much superior.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.