[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RHEL 5 glibc, was Re: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions


  • To: Geert Janssens <info@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:26:27 +0100
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:24:47 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Pwu9tK2zISE7/Y6RcNnNKocrSth08oDKuFQU7JdH18VOqiehcX0t3oNA7peqxQRKlG0VVNyKtl1XNrxTt+CIzACQxfgHH9BsUj2vyOqjnkbn9S7e88dn/asIDQELrNDP/BbPeAr4yMCu5Cu8GHtXtz3Qbx8FoIAHc4Br/AvCHoU=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Geert Janssens wrote:
1. On CentOS 5, Redhat Enterprise 5 and Fedora core 6 and up, the xen kernel can be used for both dom0 and domU. There is no need anymore for two kernels.
Has anyone properly tested the RHEL and CentOS 5 glibc in clients? I'm forced to use the xensource 3.1.0 kernel-xen kernel to get RHEL 4 DomU's, and it causes the guests to whine bitterly at boot time about the /lib/tls issues. Xensource used to publish a modified glibc for RHEL 4.4 to avoid the /lib/tls emulation issues, but CentOS and RHEL 4.5 have an even more recent glibc.



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.