[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] "Bad type" when setting PML4 on x86_64
Hi, > I'm to porting a lightweight kernel to Xen 3.0.4-x86_64 and have > run into a problem while setting the PML4. Xen complains that > it has a bad type of 'PGT_writable_page' (e8000001), while it expects > 80000000. This isn't a region of the code I've been into in-depth very often, so apologies if I'm a bit vague! > However, I'm almost certain that this is not the case. I added a routine > to do a depth first search of the four page table levels looking for this > machine frame and find that there are only two mappings of it, both of > which are flagged only as Present, non-writable, non-user. Both > mappings are from a shared PL1 directory. According to the interface > guide "a guest OS may always create readable mappings of its own > memory regardless of its current type", so it would seem that this > should be an acceptable situation for Xen. Make sure that the page is not mapped writable in *any* validated pagetable. I.e. on any pagetable you've pinned, even if it's not active, on the pagetable you're switching to and possibly on the pagetable you're switching /from/ too. > The abbreviated console output showing the results of the page table > search and the attempt to set the PML4: > > Page table search for mfn 13091: > PML1 0x6000022000[010] = 13091001 (va=0000010000 000 000 000 010) > PML1 0x6000022000[010] = 13091001 (va=6000010000 000 180 000 010) > vm_enter:895: about to instantiate new maps pml4=0x6000010000 > vm_enter:901: Using physical pml4 0x13091000 for Xen > (XEN) mm.c:1664:d72 Bad type (saw 00000000e8000001 != exp 0000000080000000) > for mfn 13091 (pfn 10) > (XEN) mm.c:1724:d72 New baseptr 13091: slow path via idle pagetables > (XEN) mm.c:1664:d72 Bad type (saw 00000000e8000001 != exp 0000000080000000) > for mfn 13091 (pfn 10) > (XEN) mm.c:1737:d72 Fatal error while installing new baseptr 13091 > > I've tried both with and without the writable page tables turned on > with vm_assist. Is there something that I am missing? This is definitely a question that'd be appropriate for xen-devel - if you post there then folks more knowledgeable than I may chime in. Cheers, Mark -- Dave: Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat? And no pedals! Mark: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard? Dave: Skateboards have wheels. Mark: My wheel has a wheel! _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |