[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Xen + RHEL5 + 64/32 bit
Mark Williamson wrote: Heh. The switch to CentOS 4.5/RHEL 4.5 is significant. Also, if you need non-RHEL versions of things, I really like the centosplus repository for far more recent but compatible versions of PHP, MySQL, and RedHat based kernels with NTFS turned on.I believe the RHEL 5.1 update is slated to include a newer Xen, possibly 3.1.I don't see how it could be 3.. Fedora Core 7 is only up to 3.0.4. And at the Xen presentation by RedHat I visited last month, they were very clear that stability and consistency of software is a big, big, big deal in the RHEL world., and I don't think they've had enough time to really test the released 3.1 code.When is 5.1 due to be released? The 5.x updates to RHEL are fairly significant - service packs, rather than simple bug fixes..I'm running my test machines with CentOS 4 and a xen-unstable compiled from source. Obviously you wouldn'twant to do that for production machines, but it works well for me.I use CentOS 4.5 with the Xensource 3.1.0 kernel, which works well.I need to upgrade :-) _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |