[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] How to tell if rpms are for PAE or not


  • To: Steven Timm <timm@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:57:51 +0100
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:52:14 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IIEqCyEFJDKenvErMqe9RI/yM1xYnjlK9uryM5mU7Wjn+JSK7q1oEHLB2fwJuRhYocC++9XF57nixHHjPVZ5E8XHTHUmSdgQMf/B8F4AfGy6Ic3TJ4KqkBA/NUCqT1wqj0Xi/M27JHCQnbq2cfb7MDpm3zDQEdTA6fUSR9BVlKI=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Steven Timm wrote:

It has been previously stated on this list that RHEL5 supports PAE
(with Xen 3.0.3).
How do we tell, given the Red Hat RPMS that go on with a default
"virtualization" install, are those PAE or not?
(I am trying to run 32-bit PAE domU's on a 64-bit xen 3.1.0 host
and I am wondering if the stock red hat kernel-xen-2.6.18 with
xen 3.0.3 is good enough to get the xen virtual client instance up
and then upgrade to xen 3.1 from there.)
Most kernels, and most certainly the RPM published kernels, contain a /boot/config-[kernel-version] file. You can read that.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.